What’s Left Behind When Christianity Goes To The Movies

Subtlety. Beauty. Intrigue. Mystery. Wonder.

These are all words that come to mind when one thinks about “art.”

So where are all these things when it comes to popular Christian filmmaking?

left behind gif

Uh. Yeah. I’ll say.

On Friday, the long anticipated remake of The Left Behind movie was released in theaters. Previous to its release, I wrote in length about some of my theological concerns with the film. But what I didn’t mention was how concerned I was about the quality of the upcoming film. Because, let’s face it, when it comes to Christian filmmaking, we don’t have a great track record. But I kept silent about my fears because I’ve been wrong before (case in point: I recently mentioned that Pluto isn’t a planet, which, evidently is no longer true).

But, alas, my apocalyptic fears seemed to be well placed. Left Behind was released in theaters today. And, despite a large budget and several big-name actors, the film is already getting canned by critics:

“…the true apocalypse of this new Left Behind—what makes it far worse than that bad original—is that it’s a soulless Christian movie starring Nicolas Cage. Which is ironic, since the idea of “soul” is such an integral part of Christianity.”

So that kinda hurts.

And it goes downhill from there: Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a 3%. Nope, there’s no digits missing from that number: three-percent. Just to put this in complete perspective: the same website also reviewed Grown Ups 2, Adam Sandler’s putrid sequel concerning which one critic remarked: “..in the first five minutes, a deer walks into the star’s bedroom and urinates on his face. It’s all downhill from there.”

And yet, RT gave Grown Ups 2 a composite rating of 7%, more than double Left Behind.

And what’s the justification for the horrible ratings?

“At best, Left Behind is shoddily made sensationalist propaganda-with atrocious acting-that barely registers as entertainment. At worst, it’s profoundly moronic.” 


“…featuring local-cable production values and dialogue that seems written by a crack team of Sunday schoolers…”


“One need not be a Godless heathen to find fault in Left Behind’s message-delivery system: It’s a fire-and-brimstone sermon wrapped in the tissue of a bad disaster thriller…”


This seems to be a trend in Christian filmmaking: we seem to think that the cinema is our opportunity to preach to people who wouldn’t otherwise want to hear a sermon. But the reality is if someone doesn’t want to hear a sermon on Sunday morning when we’re making them free espressos and giving them a gift-bag at the door then the same crowd certainly won’t want to hear a sermon when we charge them $10 for it on a Friday night.

And if you think I’m being too critical just look at the ratings for Christian films over the past few years. God’s Not Dead: 17%Facing the Giants: 13%...compared to those Nick Zano’s 2008 Fireproof looked like a rockstar with a composite critic rating of 40%. And everyone on this list looks brilliant compared to Persecuted, which opened in July and as of right now has a RT rating of, I kid you not, 0%.

“Well, it’s persecution!” you’d say. “Culture just hates us because of our faith so of course they’re going to hate our films!”

To which I would reply: spare me the nonesense.

There is persecution of Christians in the world but it certainly isn’t in the United States and certainly doesn’t consist of getting a (well-earned) 3% on Rotten Tomatoes.

Furthermore, Christians can and do succeed just fine in pop culture. I give you Switchfoot a band consisting of members who are profoundly Christian. Yet, despite of (or, I should say, because of) their faith, Switchfoot has a music career that spans two decades, have sold millions of records and won multiple awards, among them a Grammy and 12 San Diego Music Awards. They’re incredibly popular among culture, and yet also Christian. 

Then there’s writers like Marilynne Robinson. A sincere and deeply intellectual Calvinist, Robinson’s literary works have earned her a reputation as one of the greatest writers of our time, securing her a coveted Pulitzer Prize for fiction. Robinson comes from a school of writers that also includes Flannery O’Connor, a novelist and short-story writer whose work is still held as the best in its genre over fifty years after her death. Said O’Connor:

“I write the way I do because and only because I am a Catholic.”

Culture doesn’t hate our faith, it just hates our agenda. And it doesn’t appreciate Bible-thumping disguised as art.

Unfortunately, what’s so often seen in Christian filmmaking, and is reflected in many reviews of the Left Behind movie, is just that. It’s the trading of any subtle evangelism and beautiful ascetics for a Bible-thumping attitude, using the medium of film to scream: “HEY WE’RE CHRISTIAN AND THIS IS CHRISTIAN AND YOU SHOULD BE CHRISTIAN TOO!”

And that’s the best case scenario. Worst case scenario, Christian films such as Left Behind, and this spring’s release of God’s Not Dead,  trade what should be love, humility and sincerity in their messages to culture for not-so-subtle undertones of: “We’re right! You’re wrong! Nah, nah, neener, neener!”

And so we gather our non-Christian friends together, drag them to the theatre, make them sit through a couple hours of  another movie critics review as “a lifeless film, void of anything remotely human, God-like, or authentic.” Then we drive them home while they shoot us strange looks from across the car, wondering if we’ll be making a pit stop at a meeting with the next Jim Jones on the way. When drop them off we invite them to come to church and they politely refuse before retreating into their home, like a prom date who doesn’t want to get kissed, and locking all their doors and windows.

Meanwhile we sit in the car, snap our fingers and wonder: “Well dadgummit, why didn’t that work?”

Look, truth be told, Left Behind, like some of its predecessors, will probably make a lot of money this weekend. Because Christians swarm to these things. I mean, c’mon: we love a “Christian” movie! When a faith-based director rises above the filth and grime that is Hollywood and produces a film ringing of Christian virtue and truth, we couldn’t imagine anything better!

But we should.

We really, really should. 

Because what reviews of the Left Behind movie and a train-wrecked tradition of filmmaking betray is that we’ve really lost touch with our mission as Christians. It’s one thing if we want to use film to simply preach to the choir, so to speak. If the goal of Christian art is to inspire and sing our own message right back to us, so we can all nod, clap and be gleefully entertained… well, then okay. We’re doing a good job.

But if that’s the case then we’re also not Christian. Or at least, we’re not acting like it.

Because the mission of believers, the mission of the Church, is not to preach to the choir but to go out on the streets, the highways, fields and towns. The mission of Christians is to go out into culture and speak through it and to it, not with the force and bluntness of a hammer upside one’s head, but with subtly and intrigue, with a sense of wonder that causes people to stop what they’re doing, look up, and say “huh…maybe I should follow the guy they’re following.”

The goal of Christians should never be just to preach our message back to ourselves, but to speak it out into the world. And if the way we’re speaking it isn’t working, then we need to change our tactics.

Based on these film ratings, I’d say that needs to happen, and it needs to happen yesterday.

Christians can and do perform well in many other spheres of art and culture. And their faith shines through in brilliant and magnificence ways: their works inspire wonder, intrigue and desire. They attract non-Christians and Christians alike and leave all with sense of mystery, gently pulling the scales back from their eyes and allowing them to glimpse the world that exists beyond materialism, immediate gratification and even self-will.

And good art does not come at a cost of evangelism, good art does not require that we lay aside our Gospel virtues and take up secular humanistic standards so as to produce something deemed “valuable” or “beautiful” by worldly standards. Rather when done properly, good art has evangelism flowing from it naturally and effortlessly, like a river that’s finally been undamned.

The tragedy is that, as of now, many traits of good art are void when Christianity hits the big screen. And when that happens, it’s not just an abstract notion of art that suffers. Rather its the beauty and invitation of the gospel message that also gets left behind.





Why Christians Should (Not/Never/Please Don’t) Use The Left Behind Movie For Evangelism

Below is an exhaustive list of all the reasons Christians should use the Left Behind movie as an evangelistic tool to convert unbelievers to Christianity:








Yeah…so, here’s the thing: 

Uh. Yeah…No.


Tomorrow, the long awaited dreaded remake of the Left Behind series will be released in theatres. Over the past several months, there’s been much chatter among Christians about how great this movie will be as an Evangelism tactic, logic which flows from the same stream of thought that says a nuclear arsenal is important for world peace. At the forefront of such endorsements are sentiments such as those expressed by Duck Dynasty’s Willie Robertson who praised the film saying:

“…opening the door to unbelievers has never been so much fun.”

But anyone who’s read the books, seen the first movie or seen the trailer for this movie has to wonder what on earth Robinson is talking about. The Left Behind series depicts masses of people dying, planes crashing, apocalyptic terror and wrath descending upon the earth, and- have you not heard?- Nicholas Cage staring down the screen at regular intervals. What, exactly, is Robinson’s definition of “fun”? It all sounds a bit terrifying to me.

I’ve already written (rather long-windedly) about some seriously dire implications of the Left Behind series that all Christians should consider. But theological differences aside, I always take serious issue with any Evangelical tactic that is based primarily on fear. The idea of filling a room with people who don’t believe in God so they can witness a depiction of all the peril and terror they will face if they don’t convert to Christianity is just short of being classified as an emotional Crusade. It’s psychological manipulation, forcing people to make a decision based on the potential of dire consequences.

Furthermore, the basis of Christianity is not a fear of God. True, it is necessary. But do not forget what James says: even demons know God exists and shudder; even demons have a fear of God- but it doesn’t do them much good.

Because fear does not propel someone to give up everything they have and follow a lonely rabbi into the pits of poverty and despair. Fear does not prompt someone to be meek, a peacemaker, and humble to the point of self-denial. Fear does not propel you to take up your cross and follow Christ.

On the other hand: love does.

Christ never used fear as a persuasive tactic. Rather he utilized real, transformative, and relevant love. Love that was present, love that was selfless and humble with dirty hands, tired eyes and a crown of thorns.

The Left Behind series doesn’t depict such love but trades it for violence and wrath. Again (lest I be misheard) God will judge. But blunt, in-your-face proclamation of the coming judgment is not the means of conversion portrayed in the gospels or acts of the early church. And its foolhardy, to say the least, to utilize it as such now.

If you want to go see the Left Behind movie on Friday then cool, fine, go for it. Grab popcorn, a slushie, find a babysitter, have a ball. Personally, I’d sooner spend my time and money on an underwater basket weaving class than this movie… but we can still be friends.

But please, I beg of you: don’t turn to your non-Christian co-worker and ask if they wanna hang out then buy them a ticket. Don’t let your non-Christian friend’s one view of Christianity this weekend be one that instills fear; don’t let their one perspective of the Christian God be witnessed through a lens of wrath, violence and pain. And for heavensakes, please don’t call that “fun.”

Or at least don’t believe that this is something that will produce true love for God, true conversion to his flock. Because love, not fear, is what wins people to Christ, it always has and it always will.

So save your money, save your time, and spend it one something else. If you must see the movie, fine- but please, leave your friends behind.





Other Articles On Left Behind:

TF: How Not To Do Evangelism- Slacktivist

The One’s We ‘Left Behind’- After Lunch Theism

5 Things To Consider Before Taking The Left Behind Movie Seriously- Formerly Fundie















I Hope I Get Left Behind

I’m a Christian, but when the new Left Behind movie is released on Friday ushering swarms of my brothers and sisters into theaters, I hope I get left behind.

I read all the Left Behind books as a child, and eagerly viewed the original film adaptation featuring Kirk Cameron. When news broke last year that the film was being re-done, this time with a larger budget and big names like Nicholas Cage and Chad Michael Murray on board, it was almost a nostalgic moment for me.

But since reading the books, much about my faith has changed, much that has forced me to step back, shed my childhood nostalgia, and think critically about the theology behind these runaway best-sellers that infiltrated not just my own upbringing, but an entire generation of American Christianity. And when viewed critically, when examined through the lens of Scripture and the message of hope, reconciliation and Christ’s life, death and resurrection, I found there to be some startling and disconcerting thought patterns behind Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins’ books.

In many ways it would be easy, even therapeutic perhaps, to rip off my proverbial gloves and tear into The Left Behind series with great sarcasm and attempted wit. But this would be neither helpful nor conducive to important conversations that surround the topic at hand: the end times and the salvation of humanity.

So what I’ve attempted to do is summarize two of the more important and evident aspects of the Left Behind series which I’d beg all Christians to consider. I hope these are presented in ways that encourage humble and unifying conversation. Because at the end of the day, as NT Wright once dutifully noted, all language about the future is simply a set of signposts pointing into the fog. That is not to say, however, that anybody’s guess is as good as every one else’s; for we have been given a guide to lead us through the fog: God as revealed through Scripture has granted us glimpses of what to expect.

And it is based on an evaluation of these glimpses that I believe LaHaye and Jenkins are seriously misguided in the following areas:

1) A Westernized, Modern Understanding Of  Suffering

The martyrdom of Saint Perpetua, one of thousands of the early church who faced suffering and martyrdom because of their faith.

The Left Behind series is based on the premise of God’s chosen people (Christians) being raptured, zapped from earth and whisked away to heaven, previous to a period of intense and horrific trials descending upon the earth. Following the rapture, the earth undergoes numerous plagues, famines, wars, and apocalyptic nightmares all of which are painted with broad strokes of interpretation from passages in Revelation.

For starters, a certain amount of kudos must be given to the authors Larry Jenkins and Tim LaHaye for their interpretations, and everyone reading the books (most likely) understands that these are just interpretations. Inasmuch it’d be downright nit-picky for me to go through each book and argue points like: “In Revelation 6 there’s a white horse of death which you interpret as being a cloud of anthrax but if you actually knew Greek you’d dispel any such idiotic idea…”

Thus, the issue I have with the interpretation in the Left Behind series has nothing to do with the artistic approach taken to interpreting Revelation but everything to do with the attitude and lens with which the authors view the relationship between the Church and persecution.

By the authors’ understanding, Christians are rewarded for their trust in God by being liberated from tribulation; they’re raptured out of the world right before the world enters its most trying and desperate times. The underlying assumption to a belief like this is that everyone knows that God loves Christians, and if Christians have chosen to love God then God will ensure that only good things happen to Christians while in this world.

But the problem with the theology of an approach to end times that removes Christians from the picture right before they’re most needed is that it defies the very mission of the Church as it’s been understood across ages.

There’s a commercial out there, you may have seen it once, advertising for the United States Marines. The advertisement shows a dark cloud, from it whence one hears gunfire, screaming, cries of anguish, desperation, pain and hopelessness. And slowly one can see hordes of people fleeing an unspeakable terror from within the unknown darkness. But as the camera zooms out what the viewer sees, slowly, is a group of people running into the danger, running towards the terror, towards the pain, towards the evil, towards the very thing that every human instinct begs us to flee. And then we see it: they’re Marines.

What’s a shame is that we see clips such as these we think of our military and not of our Churches. What’s a shame is that when we think of heroes and don’t instantly think of Christians. Instead, the biggest “Christian” production of the year is a movie depicting a dark cloud of tribulation descending upon the earth and: TA! DA! Christians are gone! Safe! Sound! Happy! Rejoicing in heaven! Whew!

Historically, such an understanding of suffering has never been the position or viewpoint of the Church.

The earliest Christians were martyred by the hundreds. They were dragged into arenas and slaughtered by wild animals and gladiators, ripped to shreds and torn apart, literally limb my limb. The most famous account from this era tells of a new convert, a woman who was pregnant. She gave birth in a prison cell, handing her newborn child over to her family who begged her one final time to recant her faith. She refused and as a result was led to the arena where she met her death by wild beasts, hours after giving birth.

Martyrdom in the early church.

One Roman Emperor crucified Christians and would further light their live bodies afire and use them as lighting for his extravagant parties. Families could be crucified apart from each other, facing each other, so that as they died the last thing they saw was their loved ones’ naked bodies writhing in pain and the Romans below them partying, jeering and laughing at their demise.

Christians outside of and prior to American Evangelicalism have always embraced the idea that when suffering hits, when persecution comes and tribulation arrives they’ll be at its cross hairs. For:

“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you.”

John 15:18-19

And when persecution stopped, when the Church wasn’t directly persecuted or hurting, they sought those who were. When the plague swept through Europe in the Middle Ages, Christians earned a strange reputation. While everyone else was fleeing cities, even throwing their own infected family members into the streets out of self-preservation, Christians embraced those who were infected with the plague. They entered abandoned towns where only sick and dying remained and cared for them in their final hours, took in homeless and infected patients and provided decent burials for the massive piles of poignant corpses no one else would touch. Thousands of Christians died as a result but their legacy remained.

To further the point, we need look no further than our Savior. For in the person of Jesus Christ we see someone who entered into suffering rather than fleeing it:

“And (Christ)…humbled himself by becoming obedient to death-even death on a cross!”

Philippians 2:1-11

Jesus entered into the suffering of humanity for the purpose of saving it. And as a human he bypassed the religious majority (the “moral majority” if you will), bypassed the “chosen” race of the Jews, and went to the outcast, the lepers, the prostitutes, the despicable, lowly, lame, blind, ugly, tax collectors and sinners.

And the message he left was clear, the road he was calling his followers to travel was one of persecution, hardship and pain:

“Jesus replied, ‘Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.’”

Luke 9:58

“Then he said to them all: ‘Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross daily and follow me.’”

Luke 9:23

And a theology of the end times, a depiction Revelation that shows Christians being spared suffering is simply not Biblical. Rather, this is a Westernized, mutated version of the gospel where becoming a Christian is suddenly equated with happiness, where “God loves me” means “God would never let me suffer.”

We don’t ever claim to believe in health and wealth gospel because God hasn’t taken away our loan payments, our depression, our homework, our cranky boss, our family dysfunctions and similar #firstworldproblems. Life is still life and it still hurts and we realize that; but we’ve disconnected the reality of true persecution, of apocalyptic suffering, from the love of God and come to accept the belief that God couldn’t possibly love us and at the same time allow us to endure something as horrible as what Revelation depicts; surely he’ll evacuate his loved ones?

But God is a God who cares for those in pain, those who are hurting, weak, depraved, despicable and lowly. The notion that he’s going to rapture just a few chosen and submit the rest of the world to tribulation and judgment to prompt their repentance is a misconstrued understanding of the Bible, and a misconstrued understanding of God. 

And if it happens to be the case, I’d rather get left behind. Please leave me with those who are suffering, with the unchosen, with the poor, the weak and the needy.

Because you know what? When Jesus really shows up, when Jesus truly arrives on the scene, that’s who he’ll go too. If he’s the Jesus of the New Testament, he won’t go to the people who are avoiding pain, he’ll go to those who are too deep in it to know any different.

So please, hear me you: I’d rather get left behind.



2) A Hopeless Understanding Of Heaven

One artists interpretation of the rapture, where believers get snatched away from earth to heaven before its destruction.

The second and (arguably) most disconcerting aspect of the Left Behind series concerns the presented perspective of heaven. The Left Behind series stems from a tradition in theology known as dispensationalism. One of the original dispensationalists was William Miller, an American minister who lived and preached in the early 1800’s. Miller preached with urgency to what he believed and viewed was a “dying and perishing world.” Miller and others, such as John Nelson Darby, started a movement that reeked of Platonic influence and even Gnosticism in which the spiritual was good and the physical bad. We might instantly scoff our noses at this idea, but it’s seeped its way quite deeply into our current understandings and is permeating undertone of the Left Behind series.

For under the preaching of these two men came the idea that this world was in fact dying and perishing, which, its worth saying, is true. For as Paul says “all creation groans for redemption” (Romans 8:22). But what formulated out of the dispensationalist line of thought was the idea that since earth was dying, it would one day die at which time those who were saved would depart to a heaven removed from earth.

So heaven was removed from earth and earth was therefore a temporary thing, something that would be discarded after God was done with it, after the human salvation narrative had run its course. Then, once God had gotten his fill of it, he’d usher in this end times, the final scene of the play, like a re-run of the Noah narrative. But instead of an ark with one family, this time he’d snatch Christians up via the rapture, and wallah!- the earth would be destroyed, and with it our bodies gone. Then we’d all be in heaven which is somewhere, out there (though, presumably not on Pluto because the stupid thing isn’t even a planet).

Thus the belief evolved that one day God would come and rescue his chosen people and they’d all be whisked away off to this spiritual heaven. It would, after all, be a spiritual place because our bodies are still on earth- they’ve been buried under six feet of soil, remember?

But all this begs the terribly important question: what did Christ’s resurrection actually accomplish? Was it just a power move to convince us to trust him to get us outta here? Was it just some grand magic trick to make us believe that he really is God, that he really was the one who could pull it off, the one who could rescue us from this sinking ship called “earth”? Was that what it meant? We put our trust in Christ and he gets us the hell out of here before the earth goes down in flames? Raptures us away before the true shit hits the fan?

If that’s the case then the Christian hope is actually, rather…somewhat, well…hopeless.

Because what of my childhood home, the nostalgia I have for the backyard where I grew up, and the trickling brook with trout, apple trees and cool breezes in the fall? What of my current physical body? Yes, I get it, I know that right now my knee hurts, and I know I get migraines and mood swings but is it really just worthless? Is it really beyond redemption? Beyond God’s power? Beyond hope?

And what about the sun and moon and stars? Didn’t God see all this and say it was “good”? Wasn’t the plan to redeem it? To save it? Salvage it?

I thought Christ said:

“Behold I am making all things new.”

Revelation 21:5

But the notion of Christ coming and rescuing us out of here doesn’t sound like anything other than an evacuation plan; a cosmic get-away before death and destruction take their final grip of this desolate and hopeless universe.

If that is the case, then Christ isn’t really King; he didn’t win, he was forced to retreat. Sure he built a new heaven and a new earth but if earth is a battleground and we’re being raptured away, then Satan has won earth over to destruction; it’s going down in flames; death will have its reign.

And that’s not hope. That’s hopelessness.

But if Christ’s rising from the grave actually conquered death, if redemption is actually something we believe in, something we pay more than lip service too, then this earth isn’t perishing, dying and beyond hope, but is groaning for redemption.

And the new creation will come about in the form of a new heavens and new earth descending from the clouds and settling upon this earth, as is beautifully depicted in Revelation 21:2. It will come about when the shadowlands we see around us are redeemed into the magnificence that shine like Moses’ face descending the mountain and Christ at the transfiguration. It will not involve earth being discarded but transformed, just like it will not involve us being discarded. Instead it will entail us being ushered into the fulfillment of our beings:

“He will take our weak mortal bodies and transform them into glorious bodies like his own.”

Philippians 3:21

The idea of a heaven away from this earth, of redemption removed from God’s original creation is not the fulfillment of Christian hope but it’s emptying.

And if heaven is some sort of spirit world, some weird realm where we worship a god who really isn’t all powerful, who really couldn’t redeem the earth and defeat Satan but just retreated and managed to snatch up a bunch of us with him…then thanks but no thanks:

I’d rather get left behind.

The Left Behind series is an interpretation of a book of the Bible that’s really difficult to interpret. And kudos to LaHaye and Jenkins for trying. But that’s where the awards stop; that’s where I withhold my applause and start handing out harsh critique.

Because if the message of the Left Behind series is that as Christians were going to get raptured out of tribulation, away from pain and suffering when the world needs Christians the most, then count me out. If the message of the Left Behind series is that the Church is going to flee those who are persecuted, going to separate itself from those who are lost, and that God will reward this pharistical behavior with an early admission to heaven, then excuse me if I take a pass.

And if the message of the Left Behind series is that heaven hasn’t got anything to do with this earth but all hope for this earth really is lost, then I’m afraid that hope is also lost. If the message of the Left Behind series is that God’s plan was never redemption but actually retreat, that Christ’s resurrection from the grave wasn’t an example of what will come of all creation but just a tactic to convince us that he’s our ticket out of this hell-hole where death eventually will win… well, then death already has.

And that’s the message of the Left Behind series. So please, count me out. I’ve played my cards and I know where I fall.

I choose a deeper hope, a more real hope, a hope that runs toward pain and embraces it with the tears of Christ. I choose a hope that sees the hopelessness around me but sees the power of a Risen Savior who came not to rescue us and whisk us away to some far off location where we float on clouds as spirits for all eternity, but to redeem everything. Because it is good and was good and will be good again. Because death hasn’t won and will never win. Because the grave is empty.

Painting by George Richardson

But as far as the theology of the Left Behind books goes, and when it comes to the scores of Christians who will pour into theatres to see the movie this weekend, then let me just say:

I really, truly, sincerely hope I get left behind.